Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Moderator: LIHL Staff

Do you agree with all the changes explained in the first article?

Poll ended at Fri Sep 06, 2013 12:21 am

Yes, I fully agree with all those changes
12
50%
No, I dont fully agree with all those changes
12
50%
 
Total votes: 24

eldryan
Plague Treant
Posts: 1695
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:44 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Postby eldryan » Sat Aug 31, 2013 6:01 am

I want no changes to rules. not illegal to cross or whatever, it's not abuse of mechanic. also, on the note of rules against saving, is there an ns mode (ijw)? could implement

Feor
Treant
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:21 am
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Postby Feor » Sat Aug 31, 2013 11:41 am

-Ban antistuck.
-Ban reverse ( since everyone I see talking about it hates it, I cant say I am against it or for it at the moment )
-Allow double building without antistuck possible. ( cant catch leaks = sick value loss, people will be able to double for 1-2 levels max to catch the expected send , but longer db will fail )

I recently heard the comment "I dont want cross build to become the new meta".
Well tactics change, the game changes, innovating strategies always change the way we play or think and I don't think this is such a bad idea. We can allow people to use it until end of the season and see if it is truely overpowered or people can find a way to counter it.


Lets make it 1v1 only then guys the game it is ok. Ban all, ban delays, ban sharing auras, ban archers, ban mass lods. LETS PLAY LI MODE SO GAME IS FAIR.

I got an even better idea, let's play fantasy ltd. We pick towers by naming in order. I can imagine David Stern saying:
For Lance's team #1 draft for season 2 is Lord of Destruction!

User avatar
DonaldtheDuckie
Treant
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 6:02 pm

Re: Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Postby DonaldtheDuckie » Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:09 pm

Feor wrote:-Ban antistuck.
-Ban reverse ( since everyone I see talking about it hates it, I cant say I am against it or for it at the moment )
-Allow double building without antistuck possible. ( cant catch leaks = sick value loss, people will be able to double for 1-2 levels max to catch the expected send , but longer db will fail )

I recently heard the comment "I dont want cross build to become the new meta".
Well tactics change, the game changes, innovating strategies always change the way we play or think and I don't think this is such a bad idea. We can allow people to use it until end of the season and see if it is truely overpowered or people can find a way to counter it.


Lets make it 1v1 only then guys the game it is ok. Ban all, ban delays, ban sharing auras, ban archers, ban mass lods. LETS PLAY LI MODE SO GAME IS FAIR.

I got an even better idea, let's play fantasy ltd. We pick towers by naming in order. I can imagine David Stern saying:
For Lance's team #1 draft for season 2 is Lord of Destruction!


Lol :D

I support your 3 suggested rule changes. I find them to be better for the lihl than the ones ilocos suggested.

Diablo_
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3180
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 10:26 pm
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 145 times

Re: Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Postby Diablo_ » Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:25 pm

-Ban antistuck.
-Ban reverse ( since everyone I see talking about it hates it, I cant say I am against it or for it at the moment )
-Allow double building without antistuck possible. ( cant catch leaks = sick value loss, people will be able to double for 1-2 levels max to catch the expected send , but longer db will fail )


That would also be fine for me and maybe even better than banning all 3. That way double building would have the known advantages but also huge disadvantages and it probably wouldn't always be the norm and rather an optional strategy.
-----
LIHL player parser, a tool to automatically parse LIHL players' Elo and create reports for it: CLICK

User avatar
Drahque
Donator
Posts: 631
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 2:08 pm
Location: Denmark
Has thanked: 3 times

Re: Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Postby Drahque » Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:18 pm

I agree with Feor, LihlDiabloDuck and Diablo. It's indeed the best solution / idea that have been brought up so far. Maybe we should one last new vote, with these options?

supersexyy
Donator
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:26 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Postby supersexyy » Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:23 pm

The problem with feor's suggestion are the consistency issues. What constitutes double building and what constitutes reverse building? If I put 1 tier 1 on my lane then the rest on my allied lane, wouldn't that technically mean I'm double building from a very early level? It sounds like if changes like this are to be done a whole new list of complicated (and in my view unnecessary) rules will need to be introduced.
Image

User avatar
dweiler
Plague Treant
Posts: 1735
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:28 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 232 times

Re: Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Postby dweiler » Sat Aug 31, 2013 4:43 pm

I voted "no" too. I agree with Hatelose, some people are forcing a change to the game, and why, I still don't know. I agree there is room for minor changes, like draw/not draw, when exactly to use as, but those changes you guys keep proposing are like making a new game. Imo take the game as it is, or play another one :)
You don't stop playing because you grow old; you grow old because you stop playing.

eldryan
Plague Treant
Posts: 1695
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 2:44 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Postby eldryan » Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:29 am

fantasy LTD, if any1 could implement it, would be a grossly improved mode aha. all people: mutants, archers, captain, troll, messiah, lod

Diablo_
Protector of Nature
Posts: 3180
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 10:26 pm
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 145 times

Re: Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Postby Diablo_ » Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:08 am

eldryan wrote:fantasy LTD, if any1 could implement it, would be a grossly improved mode aha. all people: mutants, archers, captain, troll, messiah, lod


You are missing some tanks :O
-----
LIHL player parser, a tool to automatically parse LIHL players' Elo and create reports for it: CLICK

User avatar
Drahque
Donator
Posts: 631
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 2:08 pm
Location: Denmark
Has thanked: 3 times

Re: Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Postby Drahque » Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:14 am

Diablo_ wrote:
eldryan wrote:fantasy LTD, if any1 could implement it, would be a grossly improved mode aha. all people: mutants, archers, captain, troll, messiah, lod


You are missing some tanks :O


Tanks are overrated, and helicopters would be even more OP with those towers to gain a total of 39 % damage added. ^^,

User avatar
DonaldtheDuckie
Treant
Posts: 301
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 6:02 pm

Re: Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Postby DonaldtheDuckie » Sun Sep 01, 2013 6:19 pm

I voted no cause I dislike midbuild even more than reverse and double build. If we did a new poll with feors options I'd vote yes.

supersexyy
Donator
Posts: 3484
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:26 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: Poll about "as" "db" and "cross"

Postby supersexyy » Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:39 am

New thread up by Feor, locked.
Image


Return to “LIHL Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests