[id] RattatatDatAss @uswest

[seacow]

Your Warcraft III username: seacow
Violator's Warcraft III username: RattatatDatAss @uswest
also on behalf of that lazy Juxtapoz greiving, seacow@useast alleged mh , "gamethrow = unpause"
[spoiler=]munch is tang[/spoiler]
Game name or map name: [ENT] Island Defense #13
Stats page link: https://entgaming.net/findstats.php?id=2181082
Rule player violated: activating of command, exp, froff and gc without vote {although the builder is winning game}
Time of incidents (Note in-game timer or replay timer): 12:32
Any further thoughts:
[spoiler=]the annoying mass pause/unpause is bannable?[/spoiler]

[G3tMadbro]

This seems like is is worthy of a ban. Usually when people need votes for decisions, they need more than 50% of the people playing to agree with them. Like for instance when red choses -AR, he needs a 60% agreement or else he may be banned.

[aRt)Y]

Usually when people need votes for decisions, they need more than 50% of the people playing to agree with them.

Always 60%*

[Party-Sheeep]

Surely is worthy of a ban if the command activator doesn't get the people in the game to agree to atleast 60%. It just ruins the game for most people. He should of asked to use the command first even if the builders are winning and even at the end it changed nothing.

[aRt)Y]

Banned one day for not starting a votekick.