BRRJ_S.Dragon@useast.battle.net - TRIAL

[BRRJ_S.Dragon]

1 - Thats my only account;

2 - I have no expirience in leagues or in-houses;

3 - You can search randoms replays, unfortunately i don't save. Only did it with lihl replays that i went as observer to learn more.

4 - LIHL players that i know: SX.Chuck, Iightfyre, Madridista (Iigh's friend), ztx)fiji. I've played once with BA_Fail, Ricky911, some games with Memphis., Jack77pd, bit, matdas. But i don't know if those one will remember me, LOL.


Thank you guys!

[Iznogood]

you can find your replays here @BRRJ_S.Dragon:
https://entgaming.net/openstats/dota/?u=BRRJ_S.Dragon
We would like you to find 3 of your best replays where you use the prophet builder - Not using Elite Archers.
I can see you know a lot of people in LIHL and already obs'ed a few games - Also your ELO is above the requirements - 1637.59

[BRRJ_S.Dragon]

Well, dunno if those are the best replays.

But they are where i use prophet without Elite Archers.

[Iznogood]

Dragon6 - You made wisp lvl 6 when you had trouble holding lvl 7 already.
5/0 at lvl 10 and leaking 1 boss with ascendants

Dragon5 - Sea giant and stay 2/0 for ages.. I was sure you would that hydra for lvl 5 but instead you get 2 druid - also not upping for hydra for 7 but making a 2nd Sea giant.
4/0 at level 10 with hydra and druids - and no one on your team went income is too low.

Dragon4 2/0 at level 8 massing goliaths. 5/0 at level 10 - again you had druids and none of your teammates were leaking.

Dragon nightmares and prisoner 6/0 at level 10 - using nightmares as tank - maverick dps

- In general you seem to have a good understanding of knowing when to send.
- You have too few wisps.. and you should think about upgrading lumber-jacking once you hit 3/4 wisps
- Most games in LIHL you should expect a really hard send lvl 7 - 2 bo's are normal. Making wisp lvl 6 and not upping sea giant could hurt a lot.
- You seem to have fun while you play and participating in the chat - no flaming

Conclusion: I've seen worse replays than the ones you've chosen. They are not the best - but it was far from all negative. I just pointed out what I think you should try to improve. You have already shown that you want to play LIHL by dropping by and observing some games.
You have my vouch for a trial period.

[Feor]

You have my vouch for a trial period.

From how you described the replays ( haven't seen them ) I am quite curious how that happens.
bad tower choices and always low income.

[sX.Chuck]

I vouch for him, hes competitive and he looks for improving since he wants in LIHL, ive played with him before and I guess we could hive him a trial period. ;]

[BRRJ_S.Dragon]

- In general you seem to have a good understanding of knowing when to send.
- You have too few wisps.. and you should think about upgrading lumber-jacking once you hit 3/4 wisps
- Most games in LIHL you should expect a really hard send lvl 7 - 2 bo's are normal. Making wisp lvl 6 and not upping sea giant could hurt a lot.
- You seem to have fun while you play and participating in the chat - no flaming

Conclusion: I've seen worse replays than the ones you've chosen. They are not the best - but it was far from all negative. I just pointed out what I think you should try to improve. You have already shown that you want to play LIHL by dropping by and observing some games.
You have my vouch for a trial period.

@Iznogood, i agree with every point that you've said. I confess i still have some problems with wisps/lumberjack.
Talking about the third point, i realized that when i've started to watch LIHL replays.
That's why i want to join LIHL, to improve more and more, also that lumber problem.

[Drahque]

Rly want another Oblivion (1/8), bigdikvasian (2/11) or scuds (3/12)?

What Iznogood wrote about the replays clearly shows he isn't rdy for Lihl.
- Why let pub players fool around in games with the best players, so that they can learn on other peoples behalf's? Why should top players get punished for having a '1000' elo which in fact would be 600 elo, on their team? Really test period is being over-used nowadays and Oblivion is a perfect example of this.

[supersexyy]

Nope: we want another occupyw.street

[Iznogood]

Rly want another Oblivion (1/8), bigdikvasian (2/11) or scuds (3/12).

Krumme also started 0/8

Considering he started out with 0/5, it now seems he's starting to get used to lihl - since he got 19/23 now, so that's 19/19 last 38 games, which means he's showed progress and that he can 'survive' the hard sends in the league. I believe he should be given a chance at least till the end of the season, and if he's gone toward the wrong direction the auto-unvouch system will handle it.

A little funny how you judge the other guys so hard - maybe because they aren't on skype with you like Krumme

Conclusion: I've seen worse replays than the ones you've chosen. They are not the best - but it was far from all negative. I just pointed out what I think you should try to improve.

[Drahque]

Krumme also started 0/8

Ehm no, he started 1/5, then went 3/8 and then something like 9/12 to 11/19 to 19/23 to 31/33 to 31/39 to W/E he is now. On top of that, there is a huge difference between 19/23 and 1/8, 2/11 and 3/12.

Also you should consider reading his vouch request again, because I clearly stated several times I wasn't sure about Krumme's skill level. But that he had everything else required, such as behavior and teamwork. Also the only two people that I spoke to with on Skype before they was vouched, was 1) OccupyW.Street and 2) Krumme. Let's just say both turned out to be fit for the league? So don't say Skype have anything to do with my judgments.

P.S. about Dragon. I never said anything bad about his behavior or anything, but in my eyes it doesn't matter how kind a person is, if he doesn't have a clue how to push income properly or which towers to upgrade.

[Iznogood]

From how you described the replays ( haven't seen them ) I am quite curious how that happens.
bad tower choices and always low income.

I was very rough in my judgement - fewest people who have applied for LIHL had any knowledge of working as a team - having 1/2 people going income and some overbuilding.
I can't really judge a pub player for not knowing. What I saw in the games was a team player, good manners, above pub level and most important he has shown big interest in becoming a part of LIHL. I believe he will learn really fast and be a good asset for league.

I just want to point out that because he has my vouch trial doesn't mean he will get in. I didn't vouch him yet.
I'm obviously the only one here who have watched his replays

[Iznogood]

Krumme also started 0/8

Ehm no, he started 1/5, then went 3/8 and then something like 9/12 to 11/19 to 19/23 to 31/33 to 31/39 to W/E he is now. On top of that, there is a huge difference between 19/23 and 1/8, 2/11 and 3/12.

Krumme was 0/8.. - ztx) fiji started out with 1200 elo and is now 92/113 - 771 elo. What both of them doesn't have in common with you is being bot 5 for 2 seasons.
I can understand you're questioning the lihl-staff's judgement since you were unvouch today. But go do it in another thread and show BRRJ_S.Dragon a little respect.

[Drahque]

I can understand you're questioning the lihl-staff's judgement since you were unvouch today. But go do it in another thread and show BRRJ_S.Dragon a little respect.

My unvouch has nothing to do with this vouch request. It's things I've wanted to say for along time, but now I have the time on forums to do so. Stop making your own conspiracy theories. I never questioned your judgement, i believe it was the right thing, I shouldn't have dodged the game beacuse of Oblivion, but played it and went on forums after and explain why I belief he shouldn't be playing in the league. My actions were wrong and my actions have nothing to do with this vouch request.

[Iznogood]

Gonna leave it here and let people who actually have seen his replays or played with him like: @Iightfyre , @GoatsBeGone , @ztx)fiji , @BA_Fail , @Ricky911 , @Memphis , @Jack77pd , @bit and @matdas give their opinion aswell